Hi Welcome You can highlight texts in any article and it becomes audio news that you can hear
  • Tue. Apr 23rd, 2024

For 40 years, 2,900 plot owners in Telangana battle to recover their land

Byindianadmin

Dec 6, 2022
For 40 years, 2,900 plot owners in Telangana battle to recover their land

Hyderabad: For a number of years, countless plot owners have actually been defending the land that they had actually bought however the authorities have actually disregarded even as effective land grabbers try to take over the residential or commercial property in Keesara mandal. More than 2,900 plot owners in Anand Nagar Colony Society in Keesara mandal, consisting of retired bureaucrats, teller and officers, are at danger of losing the life cost savings that they invested to own a piece of land. According to sources, some effective individuals offered their land two times and the HMDA released structure authorizations on the 2nd sale. The owners declared that patta holders initially offered the land divided as plots to more than 1,500 individuals under a gram panchayat-approved design in between 1981 and1990 Through misstatement, the landowners presumably fraudulently gotten brand-new pattadar passbooks and title deeds from the mandal profits workplace in1998 They resold the land as farming land to a brand-new set of purchasers. The initial owners litigated and got a beneficial decree (OS 932/2001) in 2007, however the 2nd buyers continued to inhabit the lands, stated the members of Anandnagar Colony Society Recalling the case, society plot owners stated that land measuring 245 acres, categorized as patta according to the pahani of 1971-72, in Survey No.s 368 to 395 of Keesara town, Medchal-Malkajgiri district, stood in the names of Raghi Venkat Reddy, Raghi Pratap Reddy, Malla Reddy, Sudhakar Reddy, Devender Reddy, Rajeshwar Reddy (bros of the Raghi household). The Raghi household acquired design strategy authorization (2/68) from the gram panchayat of Keesara, divided the land into plots and offered them starting in1981 The Raghi member of the family performed basic power of lawyer (No. 49/1982, and No. 731/ VI/1982), and offered over 1,500 plots in Anandnagar Colony in between 1981 and 1990 to people who were staff members at the time. Most of the plots were signed up at the Medchal sub-registrar workplace. In spite of the reality that big parcels were divided into plots and offered, they were not taped in the ‘ownership column’ as plots in profits records. Even more, pattadar names continued to show in the pahanis. Benefiting from the scenario, the Raghi member of the family submitted affidavits for shared acceptance/consent with the previous MRO, Keesara mandal, in 1998, and asked for the issuance of brand-new passbooks and title deeds in accordance with the Record of Rights Act. The then Keesara MRO dispersed private shares to qualified relative and provided pattadar passbooks and title deeds. The society plot owners mentioned that the Raghi relative offered their designated qualified shares to 3rd parties through signed up sale deeds, who in turn acquired private anomaly orders, passbooks and title records starting in 2001 in accordance with the RoR Act. In January 2017, the Keesara MRO sent his report to the collector, developing that members of the society had actually bought the plots from the Raghi member of the family in1982 “Based on the files acquired through RTI from HMDA, we have actually sent a petition to the HMDA commissioner to give his attention the outright misbehaviours of HMDA authorities,” plot owners informed Deccan Chronicle. “According to RTI files, the joint collector of the RR district released a no objection certificate without diving into the benefits of the case. HMDA got a ‘legal viewpoint’ to help the design applicants, which neglected numerous material truths and relied exclusively on a created ‘Objection Withdrawal Letter from Society’s Lawyer’,” the plot owners declared. They even more declared that the HMDA had actually overlooked the presence of civil cases pending in the courts and had actually given a design sanction on a disputed website. …
Read More

Click to listen highlighted text!