.
Image by JULIAN FINNEY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.
It’s constantly bad to miss out on a penalty. However missing out on a charge that’s designed to humiliate your challenger in a key scenario? Yikes In respectful society, it’s rare to see ‘conceit’ praised. English football, nevertheless, is not respectful society, and there, under specific conditions conceit is seen not unfavorably. Take, for example, Hakim Ziyech, whose arrogance was ranked a plus by Chelsea manager Frank Lampard after the brand-new signing assisted destroy Sheffield United at Stamford Bridge. The winger, apparently, possesses, “a great deal of confidence and a certain arrogance, but an excellent arrogance.”.
( Yes, I understand, I promised you a charge. We’ll arrive! Or you can just scroll down, all excellent.).
Nevertheless, as any fan will inform you, ‘arrogance’ isn’t constantly utilized in a non-pejorative sense. As quickly as a gamer begins being showy off the field, they begin getting in trouble. Oddly, this seems to occur most often to Black footballers. Odd! Ignoring experts’ motivations behind that last bit, this uncertainty towards conceit in footballers appears a curious fault line: the word itself is broken.
This is a problem in English. Not the English, faulty though we are, but rather the language, which is trying to pack excessive conceptual work into a single word. The first is the most common, reflexive meaning, the idea of making claims beyond your proficiency or station. But the 2nd is something closer to claiming the virtues you in fact have, an idea no lower a thinker than Aristotle specifies as ‘megalopsychia’.
Megalopsychia is a challenging idea to equate. ‘Greatness of soul’ is so direct as to miss out on the point, ‘magnaminity’ too broad, and ‘correct pride’ is essentially meaningless to anybody unfamiliar with the Nicomachean Ethics. And so, in common usage, megalopsychia gets rolled up into arrogance, puzzling everybody at the same time.
Anyhow, back to sports. Here is the previously mentioned Hakim Ziyech showing megalopsychia:.
Ȁ d; ♂ þ 0f; pic.twitter.com/THo2LOnCPa— Ballon d’Or (@ZThefev) November 7,2020
It’s not just perfectly all right to embarrass one’s challenger in high-level sport, it’s downright motivated. As Lampard might say, it’s ‘an excellent arrogance’.
Another example of great arrogance is the panenka. Panenkas are a style of penalty which include contemptuously cracking towards the middle of the goal and laughing at the goalkeeper as they see the ball float in while rested on their assess, having dived to one side or another in an effort to stop the brief. The point of a panenka is not just to score the charge, however to claim footballing supremacy. A panenka asserts a certain badassery, which is precisely why it’s so beloved of folks like supreme badass white wine father Andrea Pirlo.
The only distinction in between excellent and bad arrogance is a being misinterpreted in one’s own abilities. This brings us quite neatly to Fulham FC’s Ademola Lookman, who recently tried a panenka of his own.
Fulham’s players have little factor to feel excellent about themselves. Sure, they’re all exceptionally great professional athletes, as one has to be to play in the Premier League, but by and big they’re betting better ones. The Cottagers are on course for fast transfer, the only win they have this year protests a group somehow even worse than they are, and there’s no genuine space for hope.
They weren’t rather useless against West Ham United in the Ham Derby, but they weren’t any excellent either. The majority of the match was a 0-0 caricature of the sport, however things got fascinating during injury time, when the Hammers’ Tomáš Souček smashed home what appeared like a late winner … but then, with the seconds ticking away, Fulham made a VAR-prompted charge when Tom Cairney was pointlessly tripped up in the box.
Up stepped Lookman. Now, Lookman looks like he might at some point be a really excellent player– there’s a reason RB Leipzig snapped him up from Everton when they did– but that time is not now.
But when you’re utilized to being graded on a Fulham curve and are invited into the real world, you’ll make bad decisions. Presented with the opportunity to adjust and give his team a crucial point, Lookman chose to choose a panenka. What better method to mark his presence in the video game than by embarrassing poor Łukasz Fabiański?
The line in between megalopsychia and straight-up conceit is a thin one, and with that call Lookman messed up right over it. Panenkas might look terrific if you perform one effectively, but if you fluff one? Then you’re simply wafting a shot gently at a greatful, gloating goalkeeper, leaving yourself looking like an utter fool and squandering what might have been a critical moment in your group’s season, guilty not simply of having concepts beyond your station but flaunting your deception prior to the world.
Ndugu yangu Lookman Paneka waachie kina Ramos penati kama hii ya kupata angalau alama 1 dakika za jioni Unapiga mjishuti (kama wasemavyo watu wa pemba) pic.twitter.com/v6UzSsmEeb— Ochu Mpwemuka (@Ochu_Mpwemuka) November 8,2020
As Kevin de Bruyne might tell you, a missed out on penalty is a mishap. It can occur to anybody, even the very best players on the planet. But a messed up panenka is something purer. It’s an immediate punishment for hubris, a desired embarrassment reversed, a whole-ass tragedy packed into a single kick. I like to believe that Aristotle would have enjoyed it.
Read More