Attorneys working for Jes Staley have actually implicated JP Morgan of “slanderous” attacks versus the ex-Barclays employer, stating accusations that he assisted sex trafficking operations run by the late billionaire Jeffrey Epstein were “unwarranted however severe”.
Staley’s attorney made the remarks in a Manhattan district court filing as he advised a judge to offer his customer more time to examine countless files connected to JP Morgan’s claim versus him, and sever that case from 2 claims lodged versus the United States bank over its supposed function in helping Epstein’s criminal offenses.
The filings argued that the “breakneck rate” of the case schedule, which is set for trial on 23 October, was “unneeded and prejudicial” and would offer Staley “grossly inadequate time” to safeguard himself.
“The claims versus him are unwarranted however severe: Mr. Staley is implicated of helping and abetting Jeffrey Epstein, among the most infamous wrongdoers in current American history,” Staley’s attorney, Brendan Sullivan, stated in the file, including that the claims were likewise “slanderous, and the prospective damages are huge”.
2 suits targeted at JP Morgan claim Staley– who formerly worked for the United States bank– “observed victims personally”, consisting of “checking out girls at Epstein’s houses”, and exchanged 1,200 e-mails with the late investor that consisted of pictures of girls in sexy presents and describing ladies by the names of Disney princesses.
Those claims have actually been brought by the United States Virgin Islands, where much of the abuse is stated to have actually happened at a house owned by Epstein on a personal island, and likewise by a female understood just as Jane Doe 1.
The United States bank is taking legal action against Staley in turn, stating he ought to be made responsible for any charges the United States bank might deal with as an outcome of the claims. It is likewise attempting to claw back countless dollars he was paid while working for JP Morgan.
“The stakes might barely be greater for Mr Staley,” Sullivan stated in the filing, which is asking the court to postpone the trial till March 2024.”Disproving these incorrect and highly-publicised accusations is of critical significance to him. This court’s scheduling judgments have actually badly prejudiced his capability to do so,” the legal representative stated.
A JP Morgan representative argued versus the call to different Staley’s case from its own, stating he was “inextricably connected to these cases– it makes no sense to separate him”.
“Jane Doe herself has actually straight implicated him of dreadful sexual misbehavior and, if real, he should be held responsible,” it included.
after newsletter promo
JP Morgan has formerly stated that suits versus the United States bank were “lost and without benefit”, including that the “complainants have actually made uncomfortable accusations worrying the conduct of our previous worker, and if real he ought to be delegated his actions”.
Staley established a relationship with Epstein in 2000 while he was working for JP Morgan’s personal bank, which handl