The existing scenario provides us an essential lesson about the idea of strong leadership and the contradictory significances of the expression, ‘a strong leader’. As we have actually seen different reactions to the COVID-19 difficulty across the world, we have actually begun to sort political leaders into various piles, into trays identified ‘reliable’, ‘adequate’, ‘baffled but well-meaning’, ‘unskilled’ and ‘criminally harmful self-serving buffoons’.
Traits on display
Memes point out that nations led by ladies have dealt far better with the crisis than states run by males who need to reveal their machismo more than they need to ensure the safety of their people. There have been in-depth analyses of how location, size of population, economy, culture and other aspects have all contributed towards getting worse or relieving the damage from the pandemic.
For example, to randomly take three political units ruled by elected ladies, it’s a no-brainer to see that containing the infection in Iceland (population 3.64 lakh, location 103,000 sq. km) is an extremely various proposition from doing so in Germany (approximately 80 million people in 360,000 sq. km) or West Bengal (population approximately 98 million, area 89,000 sq. km).
However, whether the leader is male or female, the political unit huge or little, lo