Darshan case: Karnataka HC reserves order on imprisoned star’s bail plea

Darshan is intending to get bail before Diwali as the Karnataka High Court is using up his appeal petition on Wednesday. The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday booked its order on the bail petition of imprisoned Kannada super star Darshan after finishing arguments and counterarguments. The Bench, headed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, will pronounce the order on the bail plea on Wednesday. Senior counsel C.V. Nagesh, standing for the imprisoned star mentioned that Darshan is struggling with serious neck and back pain, which is triggering pins and needles in his legs. He included that if the condition continues, Darshan might deal with additional health problems. Nagesh discussed that there is a concern with a disc that is blocking blood circulation, making surgical treatment inevitable for Darshan, as it can not be dealt with by other ways. He kept in mind that the health concern was not discussed when the preliminary bail plea was sent, however has actually because gotten worse, triggering them to look for bail on medical premises. He argued that everybody deserves to health, and under these situations, despite the charges, bail ought to be approved. Nagesh likewise referenced Supreme Court judgments that support this right. Unique Public Prosecutor (SPP), Prasanna Kumar, opposed the bail, mentioning that the physicians who analyzed Darshan suggested just possible future problems. In the previous report, the medical professionals kept in mind that there was no severe health concern at present. Kumar included that while there was an issue with Darshan’s hip, it has actually given that been stabilised. He likewise mentioned that the medical professional’s report does not have information about the nature of the surgical treatment, the period of treatment, and the place where the surgical treatment will be carried out. Counsel Nagesh clarified that Darshan hails Mysuru and has actually formerly gotten treatment at Apollo Hospital there, where he plans to be dealt with once again. He included that none of the case’s witnesses were based in Mysuru. The Bench observed that even undertrials have a right to health a
Find out more