Delhi HC asks Bar Council of India to set a set date for All India Bar Exam – The Indian Express

The Delhi High Court asked the Bar Council of India (BCI) on Monday to think about repairing a “pre-set schedule” for performing the All India Bar Examination to fix the unpredictability about the test dates and assist provisionally registered supporters to prepare appropriately. A single-judge bench of Justice Prathiba Singh even more asked the BCI to notify the court about the next date of the Bar test, which was last performed on October 30,2021 Justice Singh questioned the non-fixation of the test date and informed the BCI counsel, “You need to have a set date. It ought to not even be altered. I understand kids who travel for LLM. They keep believing that they will need to return to sit for the examination, however they do not understand when it will occur.” The court even more stated that Rule 9, Chapter VI of the All India Bar Examination Rules, which mentions that “no supporter registered under S 24 of Advocates Act 1961 will be entitled to practice under Chapter IV of Advocates Act 1961 unless he effectively passes the All India Bar Examination carried out by BCI”, would not be functional “qua such supporters” who are not able to clear their assessment within 2 years of their provisionary enrolment. The guideline more states that the test is necessary for all law trainees finishing from scholastic year 2009-2010 onwards and who are registered as supporters. Guideline 10 mentions that the Bar examination needs to be held two times a year in such months and locations that the BCI might figure out from time to time. Because the examination has actually not been given that last October, the court held that the petitioner will not be debarred from practicing till additional orders. “It is appropriately clarified that the petitioner will not stand debarred from appearing in courts till more orders,” the court stated. When the petitioner– Nishant Khatri, a practicing supporter who was provisionally registered on November 19, 2019– drew the court’s attention to an August 2 order of the Supreme Court that tape-recorded that the Bar examination was to be carried out in November. The plea sent that it is “now a typical practice widespread in the legal arena that a supporter can provisionally practice for 2 years without certifying the AIBE, however to continue his/her practise after 2 years, he needs to mandatorily certify the AIBE, which he was entitled to practice as much as 20.112021 without taking the AIBE”. As the examination was not held last month, he looked for security from debarment on account of the non-conduct of the test. The BCI counsel sent that the alert for the examination would be provided quickly which the hold-up was on account of the modification of the firm that carries out the examination. With regard to whether the trainees who are registered however have actually not had the ability to sit for the test as it was not performed are entitled to practice, the counsel looked for time to look for directions. The court even more kept in mind that a great deal of supporters who were provisionally registered 2 years ago dealt with the risk of debarment based on Rule 9 due to the non-conduct of the test. Describing the Supreme Court order, the high court stated, “Let a status report be submitted by the BCI providing the next date for the conduct of AIBE. The BCI needs to likewise think about having a pre-set schedule for the conduct of AIBE so that the unpredictability can be dealt with and provisionally registered supporters can get ready for appearing in AIBE appropriately”. The matter will be heard next on January 6,2023 The plea mentions that the petitioner’s income is entirely depending on his legal practice and a “gloom will dominate the income of petitioner after 28.112022” since of the BCI’s inactiveness.
Read More