HYDERABAD: The prolong in submission of inquiry legend in the case of the sub Inspector of Chandanagar, who beat up a Dalit man, exhibits how a cop is handled otherwise when he is fascinated with assault and dereliction of accountability, whereas a protracted-established man would had been without prolong taken into custody and sent for judicial remand.
Sub inspector of Chandanagar, P. Srinuvasulu, who was allegedly fascinated with assaulting a Dalit man for complaining towards a meals shipping boy who was stalking and harassing his daughter, was linked to headquarters and disciplinary complaints were initiated towards him on June 16.
The Cyberabad police commissioner formally talked about that he initiated disciplinary action towards Srinivasulu following allegations that he had threatened the daddy of a sexual harassment sufferer.“Srinivasulu allegedly threatened the daddy of a sufferer of sexual harassment, and asked him to withdraw a criticism. When the be troubled came to light, orders were passed to provoke an enquiry into the incident and linked the SI to the headquarters as part of disciplinary action,” talked about the commissioner.
“If it was a commoner caught doing this real thing, the officials would relish simply arrested him and sent him to judicial remand pending court docket listening to. Why is there a particular therapy given to the police? The so-referred to as ‘suspension’ doesn’t matter for them as they win to relish home and be part of abet with out a reason in the abet of pain,” talked about Atul Kumar, a metropolis-primarily based mostly activist.
In the final six months, 9 officials were positioned below suspension in the metropolis for causes starting from allegations of misconduct, corruption, involving in civil matters, honest turpitude, intimidation of a complainant, negligence towards their legit responsibilities in the alter of narcotics in pubs and bars, dereliction of accountability and corruption in the investigation of double execute of realtors, rather than case of CCS Rachakonda, wherein inspector Devender was caught using the debit card of a businessman while he was in detention center and withdrawing over Rs 5.5 lakh through varied ATMs.
“The total shebang about suspension is executed to either appease the victims or if there is an outcry exterior in the society. They either droop, transfer or open a departmental enquiry, which finally falls flat as they develop not ranking ‘proof’ backing the dispute. There needs to be a dusky stamp on the official for what they’ve done and the police personnel needs to be accountable for every and each case. A mere suspension is not the acknowledge in grave offences. Dismissing an official will build of abode an instance to others from picking corruption,” talked about Devi, an activist from Hyderabad.
In the Chandanagar incident, the daddy of a minor lady was allegedly beaten up by Srinuvasulu, and was also coerced into withdrawing a criticism towards the man who stalked, pressured and threatened his 16-one year-frail daughter in the title of affection, rather than mentally and bodily harassing to an extent of torching their automobile. The accused, identified as Aravind Nani, 24, who works as a meals shipping agent, colluded with a ruling celebration corporator from Serilingampally, and has reportedly asked the SI to beat the man into withdrawing his criticism. The person, who is a each day wage labourer, approached the police to whinge towards Aravind Nani, a resident of Papireddy Colony of Sangareddy, declaring that for the past five months, the girl, a Class X pupil, was tormented by Nani in the title of affection. It was also alleged that Nani threatened to rape the otherwise abled sister of the minor, if she had not fetch his proposal.
On June 15, after the intervention of Mahila Sangam, who gathered at the Chandanagar police space, the elevated officials took up the be troubled and confirmed that they’d be writing an inquiry legend to the Cyberabad police commissioner Stephen Ravindra concerning the negligence of the sub inspector and soliciting for for his suspension. The accused was booked below Sections 11 and 12 of the POCSO Act, rather than Sections 435, 436, 354 and 509 of the IPC and arrested.
…