Karnataka HC states JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna’s 2019 election null and space

The High Court in Karnataka, on Friday (September 1), stated the elections of JD(S) Member of Parliament from Hassan, Prajwal Revanna as null and space. In his judgment, Justice K Natarajan, partially enabled the 2 petitions submitted by G Devarajegowda, a citizen from the constituency, and A Manju, the then BJP’s beat prospect (2019 LS surveys) and likewise directed the Election Commission of India to do something about it versus Prajwal Revanna for election malpractice according to the Conduct of Election Process Rules, based on news company PTI report. Revanna, who is the grand son of JD(S) patriarch and previous Prime Minister H D Deve Gowda, is the only prospect from the celebration to have actually won the Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka in the year 2019. trending nowManju objected to the Lok Sabha election versus Revanna on a BJP ticket and lost. He then consequently signed up with JD(S) and is currently an MLA. The petitions had actually declared that Revanna was associated with election malpractice and likewise did not state his purchases to the Election Commission. On Friday, Justice K Natarajan determined the personnel part of his judgment in the court. Karnataka High Court has actually revoked the Lok Sabha subscription of JDS MP Prajwal Revanna, stating that he had actually submitted an incorrect affidavit to the Election Commission in the 2019 basic election.– ANI (@ANI) September 1, 2023 × “Both the election petitions submitted by the petitioners are allowed part. The election of the returned prospect, Respondent No 1 specifically Prajwal Revanna alias Prajwal R, Member of the Parliament, Constituency 16, Hassan (General) having actually been stated as returned prospect dated 23.5.2019 is thus stated as null and space,” Justice Natarajan stated. The high court nevertheless dismissed the prayer of the petitioners to state Manju as the winning prospect as he himself was “associated with corrupt practices”. “The prayer of the petitioners in both the cases to state A Manju as returned prospect is turned down in view of
Learn more