Hi Welcome You can highlight texts in any article and it becomes audio news that you can hear
  • Mon. Dec 23rd, 2024

The Debate Over Burning Dead Trees to Create Biomass Energy

Byindianadmin

Jun 28, 2020 #Biomass, #energy'
The Debate Over Burning Dead Trees to Create Biomass Energy

This story originally appeared on Yale Environment 360 and becomes part of the Environment Desk collaboration.

Jonathan Kusel owns three pickups and a 45- foot truck for carrying woodchip bins. He operates a woodchip backyard and a 35- kilowatt biomass plant that burns dead trees, and he runs a crew marking trees for loggers working in national forests. Those are a great deal of blue-collar credentials for a UC Berkeley PhD sociologist understood for his paperwork of how the decrease of the wood market affects rural neighborhoods.

What drove Kusel into a side organisation– logging little and dead trees and burning them in biomass boilers– is worry of fire. In 2007, the 65,000- acre Moonlight Fire blew flaming coal onto his lawn near Taylorsville, California, as he readied his family to leave. Last September, the Walker Fire burnt 54,614 acres simply up the valley from the offices of the Sierra Institute for Community and Environment, the not-for-profit research organization Kusel established in1993 Because 12- year span, wildfires burned 690 square miles in the northern Sierra Nevada.

Drought, a warming environment, and bark-beetle problems have likewise eliminated 147 million California trees because 2013, the majority of them along the Sierra spinal column running south from Kusel’s home base past Lake Tahoe and Yosemite National Park to Tehachapi Pass, 75 miles north of Los Angeles. Scientists say these trees are poised to burn in California’s next round of megafires, threatening the variety with blazes so intense they will leave some places unable to establish new forests.

Kusel, 63, is among a growing variety of citizens and authorities anxious to put those trees and their thick undergrowth to use before they fire up massive wildfires, pollute the air with choking smoke, and launch big amounts of CO 2 His institute has purchased logging devices to supply wood chips to community biomass facilities, which burn them to produce heat and electrical power. This is low-value vegetation that would have burned in natural fires a century back, prior to the United States Forest Service started reducing fire.

Together with thinning trees in overcrowded forests, Kusel says, biomass jobs help reconstruct rural neighborhoods by developing tasks, all while avoiding the massive carbon emissions launched in wildfires. The Moonlight Fire alone spewed the annual CO 2 equivalent of 750,000 gasoline-power automobiles.

” If we can’t figure out what to do with the lowest-value material, we will stop working at restoring our forests,” says Kusel.

Biomass projects such as Kusel’s are questionable, particularly in the Southeastern US, where states have actually rushed to convert forests into pellets for export to power plants in Europe. That market opened up after a much-criticized European Union choice to categorize biomass energy as a type of renewable energy.

As production has almost doubled at centers from Virginia to Florida, large-scale logging has had a significant impact on Southern forest environments, among the most diverse in the country. More than 35 million acres of natural forests have been lost, changed by 40 million acres of single-crop pine plantations; local species terminations doubled between 2002 and 2011, according to the Dogwood Alliance, an ecological organization securing Southern forests. The American Lung Association and various health companies blame biomass burning for a sweeping array of health damages, from asthma to cancer to cardiac arrest.

Kusel and others compete, nevertheless, that the West’s fire-prone communities make biomas

Learn More

Click to listen highlighted text!