A political firestorm erupted today when Twitter flagged 2 of President Trump’s tweets about mail-in ballot, calling them potentially deceptive, and changing them with some shy efforts at fact-checking. This action caused the President to blast the social networks platform by signing an executive order requiring a legal review of the protections it enjoys under the Communications Decency Act. The order doesn’t simply affect Twitter, but likewise Facebook, YouTube, and any platform that enables users to publish their own content.
Today on Device Lab, WIRED politics writer Gilad Edelman joins us to speak about Twitter’s foray into fact-checking, why it infuriated the President, and what potential fallout we could see from the White House’s actions. We also go over the November vote– the extremely subject Trump was tweeting about when this whole mess started.
Program Notes
Read about President Trump’s executive order targeting social media platforms here Check out Gilad’s stories about in-person voting and Twitter’s fact-checking efforts.
Suggestions
Gilad suggests utilizing a sleep mask and putting mayo on your egg and cheese sandwiches. Mike recommends The Midnight Gospel on Netflix. Lauren suggests Bookshop.org
Gilad Edelman can be found on Twitter @ GiladEdelman Lauren Goode is @ LaurenGoode Michael Calore is @ snackfight Bling the main hotline at @ GadgetLab The program is produced by Boone Ashworth (@ booneashworth). Our executive producer is Alex Kapelman (@ alexkapelman). Our theme music is by Solar Keys
If you have feedback about the program, or simply wish to get in to win a $50 gift card, take our brief listener survey here
How to Listen
You can always listen to today’s podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you wish to subscribe for free to get every episode, here’s how:
If you’re on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or simply tap this link You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts, and look for Gizmo Lab. If you utilize Android, you can find us in the Google Play Music app simply by tapping here We’re on Spotify too. And in case you really need it, here’s the RSS feed
Records
[Intro theme music]
Lauren Goode: Hi, everyone. Welcome to Gadget Laboratory. I’m Lauren Goode, a senior writer at WIRED, and I’m signed up with from another location, as always, by my cohost, WIRED senior editor, Michael Calore.
Michael Calore: Hi, hey there.
LG: Hi. How is working from house treating you this week?
MC: It’s excellent. We got a lot of plants. Now I’m surrounded by succulents, it’s improve the mood.
LG: Have you likewise began baking sourdough bread and doing Peloton workouts?
MC: Are you projecting?
LG: No. Simply wondering perhaps if we’ve both end up being work from home cliches. All. Well, I feel lucky to be working from home due to the fact that it has actually been a dire week in unemployment numbers when again. And I believe it’s got to be a long period of time prior to we see our escape of this. Today however, we are talking about something else. We’re signed up with by WIRED politics author, Gilad Edelman, his first time on Device Laboratory. Thanks for joining us.
Gilad Edelman: Really excited to be here.
LG: I’ll be honest. We initially prepared this week’s show to be about mail-in voting. It’s a crucial subject to discuss right now, and it’s going to be taking place in the coming months. And we are still going to discuss that today. Then Twitter occurred, or ought to I say the president on Twitter occurred, or must I say Twitter added a reality inspect label to a couple of the president’s tweets, which also occurred to be about mail-in voting. OK, now this has developed into a political firestorm and it has forced a much larger discussion about the role that tech platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Google play in the dissemination of info. Gilad, take us through this detailed, perhaps start with the tweets. What took place?
GE: Sure. So previously this week, the president fired off a bunch of tweets insinuating that Joe Scarborough, the former Congressman and current MSNBC TV host, whom the president is type of obsessed, with had actually killed a former employee. And then later on Tuesday, Twitter slapped a truth inspecting label on among his tweets. The amazing thing was that it wasn’t the murder tweets. Twitter actually broke the seal on reality inspecting the president for another tweet thread, that the president sent out on Tuesday early morning, about another among his favorite pastime horses, absentee voting. President Trump has been arguing for a while now that expanding access to vote by mail, which we’re going to talk about later, is a dish for fraud and a way for Democrats to steal the election from him. On Tuesday, he upped the ante by making a demonstrably false claim, saying that California was going to mail tallies to everybody in the State. In fact, they’re simply sending by mail tallies to every registered citizen, pretty huge difference. And later in the day, Twitter included a label to that pair of tweets, directing users to more info about absentee ballot in the type of a Twitter minute, noting tweets that type of debunked what the president has actually been saying.
MC: So then what took place next? How did the president react?
GE: The president responded with a lot of equanimity. He really didn’t appear to care at all. Just joking, he undoubtedly went back on Twitter and implicated the platform of breaching complimentary speech and trying to censor conservatives. And as I think we can enter into a bit later, there are strategies revealed to release an executive order that would in some way deal with the issue.
LG: Now in the previous Twitter has actually been criticized and a great deal of this criticism is directed at Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter, for not doing anything really around the president’s tweets that may have diverted into what would be thought about abusive area. Right?
GE: Right. And the intriguing thing is that what Twitter finally did here is a traditional compromise that’s going to leave no one happy. Due to the fact that a great deal of conservatives have been groaning for several years that Twitter and other social networks platforms are biased against conservatives, but at the exact same time, a lot of liberals and you do not have to be liberal to hold this view, a great deal of people have argued that Twitter and other platforms ought to be doing a lot more. When the president suggests that a TELEVISION host dedicated a murder.
And what Twitter carried out in this case was they didn’t even take Trump’s tweets down. The notice that they put on the tweets just states, “Get the realities about mail-in ballot.” So it doesn’t even plainly state that it’s false. You have to click that link to see that the platform is really disagreeing with the material of the tweets. And then if you go to that moment, that Twitter moment, that serves as the fact check, it’s a little a mess. At the top, there are a few bullet points offered by Twitter itself and they’ve cleaned this up. At initially, one of the 3 bullet points offered really misleading info about mail-in voting. So their own fact check included not absolutely clarifying details.
MC: So they’re utilizing the minutes platform on Twitter as a reality inspect system. So they’re generally simply drawing in tweets from other individuals on Twitter. What sorts of voices are being represented in this fact inspect moment?
GE: It’s a truly unusual format to use and it’s quite constraining. Reality inspecting the President of the United States is type of difficult to start with and then to choose to do it in the format of Twitter minutes is quite limiting. What they did was it’s generally a lot of tweets, many of them connecting to articles in publications like CNN, The Washington Post, Vox, other locations. And something that’s sort of odd about that is just like Facebook’s fact-checking system, they’re truly outsourcing the process to these third parties. And the issue with doing that is not every article that’s released is. A lot of the short articles in this Twitter minute, themselves just recommendation or link to other research studies or other short articles that have been composed. Therefore if you’re going to take the trouble to say here are the truths, it’s weird to then simply link to a lot of short articles that may or may not in fact have the facts right.
LG: So it’s exactly these sort of concerns that have actually come up before that have actually resulted in a broader discussion about whether or not platforms like Twitter and facebook need to be “arbiters of reality.” And there are some guidelines and institutions that exist in our society, here in the United States, that sort of produce this structure in which platforms can operate