July 18, 2022 – The sandwich chain Subway is not any stranger to scandals. In 2013, Subway settled a order that alleged its footlong subs had been shorter than marketed. Then, in 2014, it continued a scandal over a “yoga mat” chemical demonstrate in its bread. Now, the enviornment’s ideal sandwich chain is dealing with one other controversy: whether or no longer the tuna fish it makes utilize of is really 100% tuna.
This month, U.S. District Think Jon Tigar rejected Subway’s question of to dismiss a lawsuit over the franchise chain’s tuna products, ruling Nilima Amin of Alameda County, CA, would possibly proceed the suit she filed in January 2021.
The customary criticism acknowledged Subway tuna products had been misbranded below federal and California authorized pointers, leading customers to pay extra for “top class priced food dishes” and to imagine they are drinking “handiest tuna and no slightly about a fish species, animal products, or miscellaneous products.”
“Subway misrepresents its products as ‘100% tuna,’” the renewed 2022 case reads. “[Consumers] had been tricked into buying food items that wholly lacked the ingredient they fairly opinion they had been buying.”
Subway: ‘We Are Dissatisfied’
The court docket pushed aside facets of the plaintiff’s order, alongside side the allegation that Subway deceived customers by selling sandwiches that had been no longer 100% tuna.
“Customers consider the truth that tuna salad is mostly combined with mayonnaise, and that a tuna sandwich will appreciate bread,” the bring together’s ruling argued.
Nonetheless he did no longer dismis