Cricket latest
Reported By: | Edited By: DNA Internet Crew |Supply: DNA webdesk |Up so a long way: Could per chance per chance 20, 2022, 06: 39 AM IST
The Supreme Court docket on Thursday delivered a key verdict in the 1988 avenue rage case engaging Congress chief Navjot Singh Sidhu, sentencing him to 300 and sixty five days of rigorous imprisonment. While announcing the sentence, the court said that a “hand is a weapon” when it comes to a cricketer.
While listening to the plea filed by the family of the deceased victim, the apex court said that ‘hand can moreover be a weapon when a cricketer or extraordinarily physically match particular person inflicts the connected’. The bench additional remarked that a disproportionately light punishment humiliates and frustrates a victim of crime when the perpetrator goes unpunished or is let off with a sexy minor punishment.
The apex court bench, comprising of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, sentenced Sidhu to penal complex in the 34-year-passe avenue rage case, whereby an aged particular person lost his lifestyles after being struck by the Congress chief on his head, consistent with reports.
While handing over the decision, the court said, “The hand can moreover be a weapon by itself the attach apart train a boxer, a wrestler or a cricketer or an especially physically match particular person inflicts the connected. This might well also be understood the attach apart a blow might well moreover very effectively be given either by a physically match particular person or to a extra archaic particular person.”
“Insofar as the damage triggered is concerned, this Court docket has permitted the plea of a single blow by hand being given on the head of the deceased. In our inspect, it’s miles this significance which is an error apparent on the face of the story needing some remedial action,” the apex court additional added, as per PTI reports.
The court additional noticed that the blow used to be no longer inflicted on a particular person identically physically placed nonetheless on a 65-year-passe particular person, bigger than double his age and Sidhu can no longer train that he didn’t know the fabricate of the blow or plead lack of consciousness on this facet.
(With PTI inputs)
READ | 1988 avenue rage case: Will Navjot Singh Sidhu be ready to contest polls in future?