‘There may perhaps be no longer any convoy to enhance’ Lich testifies in defence of accepting ‘freedom award’

A purchase will come to a resolution on Wednesday whether or no longer Tamara Lich must always be returned to jail over alleged violations of her bail prerequisites or whether or no longer these prerequisites must always be relaxed to reinstate Lich’s come by entry to to her social media accounts.

Superior Court docket Justice Kevin Phillips will take into myth exhaustive arguments on both opposing proposals heard over a two-day, two-pronged bail analysis, with Assistant Crown Authorized expert Moiz Karimjee arguing Lich’s bail must always be revoked over her acceptance of a “freedom award” from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, amongst diversified alleged violations.

This week’s noteworthy-anticipated bail analysis of one of doubtlessly the most prominent “Freedom Convoy” leaders had to initiating out with been scheduled for Lich’s attorney, Lawrence Greenspon, to topic the bail condition limiting her from the expend of any social media accounts.

Greenspon argued that condition used to be overly mountainous and restrictive, amounting to an outright “banishment.”

The Crown argued Lich must always be returned to jail on the grounds that she had “persevered her enhance of the convoy trigger” by agreeing to come by the 2022 “George Jonas Freedom Award,” which is to be presented at a June 16 gala in Toronto featuring keynote speaker Rex Murphy.

The bail analysis resumed Friday with Karimjee accusing Lich of violating her bail prerequisites — as soon as when she agreed to come by the award and all over again when she agreed to be “label ambassador” for a convoy-themed pendant.

Karimjee instructed both were elevating money for causes related to the “Freedom Convoy,” which would perchance presumably well violate her liberate prerequisites. The worn prosecutor furthermore made an on-file recommendation that the JCCF — an even advocacy community and a vocal supporter of the “Freedom Convoy” — used to be financing her unprejudiced appropriate defence.

Lich testified from her Alberta house that she did no longer deem her acceptance of the 2022 “George Jonas Freedom Award” from the JCCF constituted a breach, whereas Greenspon lodged a straight away objection to any questions related to her unprejudiced appropriate fees.

“Wow. Object,” Greenspon stated, citing a “sure case” of solicitor-client privilege.

Superior Court docket Justice Kevin Phillips sided with Greenspon on that time, ruling the privacy of solicitor-client privilege “a ways outweighs” any fee the proof of her unprejudiced appropriate fees may perhaps presumably well even provide to the complaints.

Temperatures had cooled considerably internal courtroom No. 36 by the purpose the listening to resumed Friday following a fiery Thursday session that featured a uncommon sullen commerce between Karimjee and Phillips, the presiding purchase.

Karimjee at one point asked the purchase to “recuse” himself, a inquire Phillips deni