Cricket latest
Reported By: | Edited By: DNA Internet Group |Source: DNA webdesk |Updated: Would per chance well maybe simply 20, 2022, 06: 39 AM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a key verdict in the 1988 motorway rage case appealing Congress chief Navjot Singh Sidhu, sentencing him to 1 twelve months of rigorous imprisonment. Whereas asserting the sentence, the courtroom said that a “hand is a weapon” when it involves a cricketer.
Whereas hearing the plea filed by the family of the deceased victim, the apex courtroom said that ‘hand could be a weapon when a cricketer or extraordinarily physically fit person inflicts the identical’. The bench further remarked that a disproportionately mild punishment humiliates and frustrates a victim of crime when the perpetrator goes unpunished or is let off with a fairly minor punishment.
The apex courtroom bench, comprising of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, sentenced Sidhu to jail in the 34-twelve months-pale motorway rage case, in which an elderly person lost his lifestyles after being struck by the Congress chief on his head, in step with reports.
Whereas handing over the decision, the courtroom said, “The hand could be a weapon by itself where advise a boxer, a wrestler or a cricketer or an awfully physically fit person inflicts the identical. This could be understood where a blow could be given either by a physically fit person or to a more frail person.”
“Insofar as the wound led to is concerned, this Court has popular the plea of a single blow by hand being given on the head of the deceased. In our stare, it is this significance which is an error apparent on the face of the file desiring some remedial action,” the apex courtroom further added, as per PTI reports.
The courtroom further seen that the blow was as soon as not inflicted on an person identically physically placed nonetheless on a 65-twelve months-pale person, bigger than double his age and Sidhu can’t advise that he didn’t know the have of the blow or plead lack of know-how on this bid.
(With PTI inputs)
READ | 1988 motorway rage case: Will Navjot Singh Sidhu have the flexibility to contest polls in future?