As the November election approaches with control of the House and Senate on the line, the stakes are high. With so much riding on the outcome, there is no shortage of debate about the message Democrats need to win.
Affordability has emerged as a shared – if often undefined – rallying cry. Working families are struggling with rising costs and looking for answers. But too often, we’ve seen affordability positioned as the beginning and end of the plan. Meanwhile, many see holding the Trump administration accountable for its corruption and harms as at odds with a relentless focus on kitchen-table issues.
In such a moment, what kind of message actually breaks through to voters?
To find out, Indivisible partnered with Lake Research Partners to go directly to the voters Democrats need to win: 2026 battleground voters, key 2028 Senate battleground voters, and voters of color across the south.
What we found challenges the conventional wisdom that affordability and accountability are competing priorities. Affordability is essential, but our polling shows that the case for lowering costs becomes more compelling when paired with a clear commitment to take on corruption and special interests.
The data makes clear why. Seventy-one per cent of 2026 battleground voters are extremely concerned about politicians rigging the system to benefit themselves at the public’s expense, while 69% are extremely concerned about political corruption costing taxpayers money. And 88% strongly agree that we must focus on both lowering costs and addressing corruption. These numbers are astounding – 88% of Americans probably can’t agree what color the sky is, but they agree on these issues.
Most importantly, the combination is far more persuasive than either message alone. Seventy-three per cent of 2026 battleground voters are more likely to support a candidate who both fights to lower costs and takes on corruption and special interests, compared with just 19% who prefer a candidate focused solely on corruption and 5% who prefer one focused solely on lowering costs. The takeaway is clear: voters find the two issues far more compelling when paired together.
The point is not simply that voters care about both affordability and corruption. It is that accountability gives an affordability agenda credibility. When voters believe the system is rigged, a promise to lower costs can sound like another campaign pledge that will never become reality. Showing voters that Democrats are willing to fight against the status quo answers the question lurking behind every campaign economic promise: why should voters believe this time will be different?
That helps explain why anti-establishment outsiders are viewed more favorably than either political party: they are seen as more willing to challenge the system, rather than simply manage it. For Democrats, that is both a warning and an opportunity. Concrete plans to lower costs matter, but they become more credible when Democrats make clear that they are willing to confront the powerful interests that have benefited from the current political order. With Republicans in control of the House, Senate, presidency and supreme court, they can’t credibly claim to be fighting a corrupt regime they themselves control. But Democrats can force them to defend the indefensible.
Trump and his regime have made corruption impossible to ignore, so Democrats should connect the administration’s self-dealing and abuses of power to the economic pressures voters are feeling, showing that the fight against corruption is also a fight against the forces making life more expensive. Then they should pair those attacks with concrete plans to lower costs.
And if Democrats win in November on that message, they must follow through. A mandate to take on corruption and lower costs cannot end on election day. Democrats should use the power voters give them in 2027 to conduct aggressive oversight, expose politicians and corporate actors lining their pockets at the public’s expense, and hold the powerful accountable. That follow-through is essential to rebuilding a credible opposition party and a Democratic brand that too many Americans see as part of the problem.
The path to November is clear: run on affordability, but make the case for why Democrats can actually deliver it by pairing concrete plans to lower costs with a commitment to take on corruption and special interests. Voters do not just want to hear that Democrats understand the affordability crisis. They need to believe Democrats are willing to fight the people and interests standing in the way of solving it.
Affordability and accountability, together, offer Democrats the strongest case to voters – and a mandate to govern after winning.
Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg are co-executive directors of Indivisible